Testing the Hypothesis Part 2
Who: The following are conclusions based on the interviews I conducted with five new individuals who essentially have the need but are already supplementing it with another form:
- Interview 1: I found that some people don't need snacks to supplement calorie deficiency because they would make up for it by eating a heavy amount of calories during breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
- Interview 2: I found that some people would do a calorie deficit because they wanted to lose weight. They assumed that by burning more calories than they're consuming effectively helps them lose weight.
- Interview 3: In my third interview, I found that people do need that extra snack in between meals to ensure that people get their needed calories; however, instead of snacks they would replace them with protein shakes. I found these individuals to be outside the boundaries of my market.
- Interview 4: In interview four, I found a new market, mothers. Mothers usually supply their kids with protein or granola bars for when they go to school. My product would be a perfect supplement to replace the store bought granola bars and protein bars.
- Interview 5: I received the same new information that I got from interview one.
Why: I want to supply this product to save people from the time and hassle of making healthy snacks at home.
|
Inside
the Boundary
|
Outside the Boundary
|
|
Who is in: Gym Goers, Outside Workers, “Health nuts”, and
Mothers
|
Who is out: Those without calories deficits, those who eat 3
large meals a day, those trying to have calorie deficit, those with peanut
allergies.
|
|
What the need is: An alternative to making your own healthy, homemade
snacks
|
What the need is not: A snack that’ll solve your weight problems being
coined as “healthy”.
|
|
Why the need exists: For people who don’t want to go through the hassle
and time to make their own form of healthy snacks.
|
Alternative explanations: A healthy snack to eat between meals.
|
Austin,
ReplyDeleteYou did a real good job on this assignment. You did a good job describing who is within the boundary and who is not within the boundary. Your summary was also very descriptive and clearly stated all of the important details about your opportunity. One thing I would recommend for your next post is to give more details about the boundary, of your opportunity.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAustin,
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting to see the other side of these interviews. It's great that you didn't have negative responses, but instead just had people who don't have the need, even though they're in a similar demographic or market. You were able to find specific reasons that people wouldn't be able to use your product. This means that they also may represent new markets and new opportunities. On top of that, you found an entirely new market. Great job!